CHAPTER
I
INTRODUCTION
Language is system of sound symbol used by humans to communicate.
Finnochiaro and Brumfit (in Richard and Rodger, 1995: 65) said that language as
means as communication, there are many languages which can be used in doing
interaction with others. English in Indonesia is has been taught as a foreign
language in all school levels (from elementary up to the university
level).
In
English curriculum, students’ speaking ability is very hoped in teaching and
learning process especially in teaching English because English is compulsory
subject must be known for all of students to develop through four skills,(
listening, Speaking, Reading and Writing. A language learner can not be able to
convey or interpret messages in spoken or written form with others without mastering
communicative aspect, such as: grammatical, discourse, sociolinguistics,
pragmatics, etc. in other word, successful speaker/reader means someone who is
able to convey, interpret, negotiate meaning.
The
aspects of communicative competence have some categories. Brown (1994: 66)
divides communicative competence into grammatical, discourse, sociolinguistics,
pragmatics, and strategies. The components of communicative competence itself
can be acquired by four skills namely listening, Speaking, Reading, and
Writing, but in this case, the writer emphasized on speaking skill ability, but
it is not enough to provide students by speak opportunities in English. The
teacher needs to help students to communicate actively facilitate when
participating in class discussion or in conversation, because the students need
time to plan and organize their message while speaking.
Many
Indonesian students in all level find a lot of difficulties in mastering four
speaking skills. In this study, the writer focused on observing students’
problem in speaking ability. Because speaking seem to be the most difficult and
also many students say that it is not used in their daily communication to
speak. This is why, caused by the English teacher is not yet be able in using
approach method.
The
most important is the teachers ability in applying appropriate or techniques in
teaching learning process . So, Many students were not interest in learning English.
Therefore, English teacher suggested to be able mastering
teaching methods, such as, Nababan (1991: 4) with notices that a
qualified teacher is teacher who is able to suit best method or technique to
the material that is being taught.
Language
to a language teacher needs to acquire a set of skills to develop his attitudes
towards peers, and must understand some theoretical knowledge about how human
learns.
In
language classroom, there were various important aspect like method,
strategies, approaches and time allotment use by the educator as
source of information (especially English teacher) to the students. This method
used to get student achievement and more familiar to the target language as the
objective of learning Ryan and Cooper in Brown (1993). This intended to modify
teaching learning process to improve student achievement in order to be able to
use target language effectively and approplitely method or strategies,
approach, source material, which use by the teacher arouse students motivation
approped teaching techniques can help the student to using teaching learning
improve their performance by actively and effectively.
From
the explanation above, we can concluded that teaching technique
enable the English teacher can teach the students to communicate in target
language as the objective learning. In the sense, the writer often hear beyond
the drilling technique, grammar translation method, audio lingual method, and
elect approach which were demand the students to focus of learning and also the
teacher suggested in present the materials must suitable by what learner
needed.
Beside
the phenomenon above, this paper will investigate the most effective
teaching methods was communicative approach, this approach which
help teacher motivate his students, automatically it can improve,
increase achievement in the implementation of communicative approach
in teaching speaking .
CHAPTER
II
CONTENTS
A.
Definition of
Communicative Approach
The communicative approach is based
on the idea that learning language successfully comes through having to
communicate real meaning. When learners are involved in real communication,
their natural strategies for language acquisition will be used, and this will
allow them to learn to use the language.
For example,Practising question forms
by asking learners to find out personal information about their colleagues is
an example of the communicative approach, as it involves meaningful
communication.
The communicative approach (CA) was
developed by Robert Langs MD, in the early 1970’s. It is a new theory or
paradigm of emotional life and psychoanalysis that is centered on human
adaptations to emotionally-charged events-with full apprecition that such
adaptations take place both within awareness (consciously) and outside of
awareness (onconsciously). The approach gives full credence to the unconcious
side of emotional life and has rendered it highly sensible and incontrovertible
by discovering a new, validated,and
deeply meaningful way of decoding unconcious messages. This
procedure-called trigger decoding –has brought forth new and highly
illuminating revisions of our understanding of both emotional life and
psychotherapy , and it calls for significant changes in presently accepted
psycoanalytic thinking and practice.
B. Overview of The Technique
There
are five technique in communicative approach.
v Authentic
Materials
To overcome the typical problem that
students can’t transfer what they learn in the classroom to the outside world
and to expose students to natural language in a variety of situations,
adherents of the communicative approach advocate the use of authentic language
materials. In this lesson we see that the teacher uses a copy of genuine
newspaper article . He also assigns the students homework, requiring they
listen to a live radio or television broadcast.
Of course , the class
that we observed was at the high intermediate level of profiency . For students
with lower proficiency in the target language, it may not be possible to use
authentic language materials such as these. Simpler authentic materials (for
example,the use of a weather forecast when working on predictions ), or at
least ones that are realistic, are most desirable . It is not so important that
the materials be genuine as it is that they be used authentically.
Another possibility for the use of
authentic materials with a lower level class is to use realia that do not
contain a lot of language,but about which a lot of discussion could be generated
. Menus in the target language language are an example;timetables are another.
v Scrambled
sentences
The students are given
passage (a text) in which the sentences are in a srambled order . This may be a
passage they have worked with or one they haven’t seen before. They are told to
unscramble the sentences the sentences so that the sentences are restored to
their original order. This type of exercise teaches students about the cohesion
and coherence properties of language. They learn how sentences are bound
together at the suprasential level through formal lunguistic devices such as
anaphoric pronouns, which make a text cohesive, and semantic propositions,
which unify a text and make it coherent.
In addition to written passages, students
might also be asked to unscramble the lines of a mixed-up dialog. Or they might
be asked to put the pictures of a picture strip story in order and write lines
to accompany the pictures.
v Language
Games
Games are used
frequently in the communicative approach . The students find them enjoyable,
and if they are properly designed, they give students valuable communicative
practice . Games that are truly communicative , according to Morrow (in Johnson
and Morrow 1981) , have the three features of communication : information gap,
choice , and feedback.
These three features
were manifest in the card game we observed in the following way : An
information gap existed because the speaker did not know what her classmate was
going to do the following weekend. The speaker had s choice as to what she
would predict it (which form her prediction would take). The speaker recaived
feedback from the members of her group. If her prediction was incomprehensible
, the none of the members of her group would respond. If she got a meaningful response,
she could presume her prediction was understood.
v Picture
Strip Story
Many activities can be
done with picture strip stories. We suggested one in our discussion of
scrambled sentences.
The activity using a
problem solving tasks as communicative technique . Problem – solving tasks work
well in the communicative approach because they usually include the three
features of communication. What’s more , they can be structured so that
students share information or work together to arrive at a solution. This gives
students practices in negotiation meaning.
v Role
Play
Role-plays are very
important in the communicative approach because they give students an
opportunity to practice communicating in different social contexts and in
different social roles. Role-plays can be set up so that they very structured
(for example , the teacher tells the students who they are and what they should
say) or in a less structured way (for example,the teacher tells the students
who they are, what the situation is, and what they are talking about, but the
students determine what they will say ). The letter is more in keeping with the
communicative approach,of course,because it gives the students more of choice.
C. Communicative Approach Purpose
The goal of this
metode is to have one’s students become communicatively competent. While this
has been the stated goal of many of the other methods , in the communicative
approach the notion of what it takes to be communicatively competent is much
expanded.
Communicative
competence involves being a ble to use the language appropriate to a given
social context. To do this students need to know that many different forms can
be used to perform a functions. They must be able to choose from among these
the most appropriate form, given the social context and the roles of the
interlucotors. They must also be able to manage the process of negotiating
meaning with their interlucotors.
D. The Communicative Approach Using Language
Games Technique
v Why use games in teaching English?
Language learning is hard work. Effort is
required at every moment and must be maintained over a long period of time.
Games help and encourage many learners to sustain their interest and work.
Games also help the teacher to create contexts in which the language is useful and meaningful. The learners want to take part and in order to do so must understand what others are saying or have written, and they must speak or write in order to express their own point of view or give information.
The need for meaningfulness in language learning has been accepted for some years. A useful interpretation of 'meaningfulness' is that the learners respond to the content in a definite way. If they are amused, angered, intrigued or surprised the content is clearly meaningful to them. Thus the meaning of the language they listen to, read, speak and write will be more vividly experienced and, therefore, better remembered.
If it is accepted that games can provide intense and meaningful practice of language, then they must be regarded as central to a teacher's repertoire. They are thus not for use solely on wet days and at the end of term!
Games also help the teacher to create contexts in which the language is useful and meaningful. The learners want to take part and in order to do so must understand what others are saying or have written, and they must speak or write in order to express their own point of view or give information.
The need for meaningfulness in language learning has been accepted for some years. A useful interpretation of 'meaningfulness' is that the learners respond to the content in a definite way. If they are amused, angered, intrigued or surprised the content is clearly meaningful to them. Thus the meaning of the language they listen to, read, speak and write will be more vividly experienced and, therefore, better remembered.
If it is accepted that games can provide intense and meaningful practice of language, then they must be regarded as central to a teacher's repertoire. They are thus not for use solely on wet days and at the end of term!
Language learning is a
hard task which can sometimes be frustrating. Constant effort is required to
understand, produce and manipulate the target language. Well-chosen games are
invaluable as they give students a break and at the same time allow students to
practise language skills. Games are highly motivating since they are amusing
and at the same time challenging. Furthermore, they employ meaningful and
useful language in real contexts. They also encourage and increase cooperation.
Games are highly motivating because they are amusing and interesting. They can be used to give practice in all language skills and be used to practice many types of communication.
Games are highly motivating because they are amusing and interesting. They can be used to give practice in all language skills and be used to practice many types of communication.
v The implementation of Language
games in teaching English
Games
are used frequently in the communicative approach . The students find them
enjoyable, and if they are properly designed, they give students valuable
communicative practice . Games that are truly communicative , according to
Morrow (in Johnson and Morrow 1981) , have the three features of communication
: information gap, choice , and feedback.
These
three features were manifest in the card game we observed in the following way
: An information gap existed because the speaker did not know what her
classmate was going to do the following weekend. The speaker had s choice as to
what she would predict it (which form her prediction would take). The speaker
recaived feedback from the members of her group. If her prediction was
incomprehensible , the none of the members of her group would respond. If she
got a meaningful response, she could presume her prediction was understood.
CHAPTER
III
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
v www.teflgames.com/why.html
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar